Plant Capacity Decision: 2 TPH vs 5 TPH
Investment decision framework — CAPEX · Returns · Scale economics · Risk profile · Go/No-Go recommendation
RECOMMENDATION: 5 TPH PLANT — GO WITH CONDITIONS
5 TPH delivers superior IRR (108.9% vs 89.9%), higher NPV (₹39.1 Cr vs ₹12.5 Cr), and better fixed-cost absorption per tonne. Recommended subject to debt availability and feedstock security.
2 TPH PLANT
Lower CAPEX · Faster Payback · Phase 1 Entry
Total CAPEX₹2.49 Cr
Equity Required₹1.00 Cr
Debt Required₹1.50 Cr
Design Capacity12,000 T/yr
Yr1 Revenue₹7.20 Cr
Yr2 Revenue₹9.39 Cr
Yr2 EBITDA₹3.18 Cr
Yr2 EBITDA Margin33.9%
Yr2 PAT₹2.12 Cr
Project IRR89.9%
Equity IRR183.3%
NPV @ 14%₹12.5 Cr
PaybackYr 1.3
DSCR (Yr2)7.67x
VC per Tonne₹5,000/t
5 TPH PLANT
Scale Economics · Higher Returns · Bankable
Total CAPEX₹6.25 Cr
Equity Required₹2.50 Cr
Debt Required₹3.75 Cr
Design Capacity30,000 T/yr
Yr1 Revenue₹18.0 Cr
Yr2 Revenue₹23.5 Cr
Yr2 EBITDA₹9.94 Cr
Yr2 EBITDA Margin42.3%
Yr2 PAT₹6.82 Cr
Project IRR108.9%
Equity IRR231.9%
NPV @ 14%₹39.1 Cr
PaybackYr 1.1
DSCR (Yr2)9.58x
VC per Tonne₹4,500/t
Head-to-Head Decision Matrix
✓ marks the winner per metric
Financial Performance Comparison
₹ Crores
Multi-Dimensional Score Radar
Normalized 0–100 across 6 dimensions
Choose 5 TPH When
- Equity of ₹2.5 Cr+ is available or can be raised
- Debt of ₹3.75 Cr+ is accessible (CGTMSE / bank term loan)
- Feedstock supply of 28,500+ T/yr is secured or contracted
- Offtake agreement with NTPC / TPP / industrial buyer in place
- Long-term scale and market leadership is the objective
- Carbon credit monetisation is being pursued (adds ₹3–5 Cr/yr)
Choose 2 TPH When
- Equity is constrained to ₹1 Cr range — lower capital risk
- Feedstock supply is uncertain — test market with smaller volume
- First-time operator — build operational experience at lower scale
- Regulatory / land approvals are still in progress
- Phase 1 strategy: prove model, then expand to 5 TPH in Yr 3–4
- Faster payback preferred over maximum NPV